The U.S. Starts Killing Its Own Again

View previous topic View next topic Go down

The U.S. Starts Killing Its Own Again

Post  NEADP on Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:26 pm

The U.S. Starts Killing Its Own Again


Murder and capital punishment are not opposites that cancel one another, but similars that breed their kind.--George Bernard Shaw


On April 16, 2008, the Supreme Court ruled that lethal injection was not cruel and unusual punishment. This means that, with premeditation but no malice aforethought, 36 states can now start killing their own again.

The good justices apparently did not know that these same drugs are illegal for animal euthanasia. One of the saddest ironies of 19th Century English justice is the fact that several alert members of Parliament discovered that they could use laws against the inhumane treatment of animals to outlaw child labor.

On October 10, 2007 the European Union and the United Nations declared a "World Day Against the Death Penalty," celebrating the 137 countries that no longer execute their own citizens. In 2007 the U.S. joined Saudi Arabia, Iran, China, and Pakistan in taking the lives of 1,252 of their compatriots, 88 percent of the executions in the world that year.

In December of 2007 New Jersey's elected representatives voted to join 13 other abolitionist states. The majority agreed with a state commission's conclusion that the death penalty "is inconsistent with evolving standards of decency."

Polls of New Jersey's residents gave conflicting advice: 53 % still supported executions, but 52 % said that they would favor life without parole instead. This is now the sentence for the 8 prisoners who once were on New Jersey's death row.

New Jeryseans are part of a national trend towards life without parole. For the 1st time in history a 2006 Gallup poll found that the life sentence was favored over death by 48 to 47 %. This is a major shift considering that in 1997 that percentage was 61 to 29 against permanent incarceration.

Cost was also a big consideration for the legislators of the Garden State. Each ordinary prisoner cost $40,121 annually, while those waiting for execution cost $72,602 per year. These figures of course do not include the cost of appeals, which amounted to $250 million since 1985.

Since 1973 over 120 people have been released from death row because they were found innocent. For non-capital charges, DNA evidence has cleared another 200 people since 1989. These figures have had wide news coverage, and they have led to a dramatic shift in public opinion.

A 2007 study done by the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC at http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/CoC.pdf) reported that 62 percent had a change of heart because of these findings of innocence. A full 60 % reported "lessened support" for or "increased opposition" to state executions.

The DPIC study reported that only 39 % has confidence that only the guilty will be put to death. This poll also found that a staggering 87 % believe that the U.S. has already executed an innocent person. There is very strong evidence that at least 4 people--1 in Missouri and 3 in Texas--have already died for crimes they did not commit.

The DPIC study registered a new low of 38 % for those who believe that the death penalty deters crime. The most compelling argument is to compare Northeastern states, where 4 have been executed since 1976, to the Southern states, where 901 have been received capital punishment. The murder rate for the former is 4.5 per 100,000 while the rate for the latter is 6.8 per 100,000.

Yet another telling result of the 2007 poll was the 69 % who believe that reforms will not fix the problems with death penalty. The only alternative of course is stop state governments from killing their own citizens.

Major newspapers that previously supported executions now stand against the death penalty. The editors of the Dallas Morning Herald state: "We do not believe that any legal system devised by inherently flawed human beings can determine with moral certainty the guilt of every defendant convicted of murder."

Those who are thinking "Isn't this the columnist who supports Roe v. Wade?" may have forgotten that our legal, moral, and religious traditions have held that the abortion of the early fetus is not murder. Read http://www.home.roadrunner.com/~nickgier/abortion.htm.

Therefore, protecting the right of women to choose is a sign of membership in the club of civilized nations, but state sanctioned murder of criminals happens only in countries such as Libya, Cuba, North Korea, Sudan, and the United States of America.

(source: Column, Nick Gier taught philosophy at the University of Idaho for 31 years--New West)

NEADP
Admin

Number of posts : 52
Age : 37
View : Anti-Death Penalty
Registration date : 2008-06-17

View user profile http://neadp.fullboards.com

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum